Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings (D-Fla.)

District: 20th District
Political Highlights: sought Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate, 1970; U.S. District Court judge, 1979-89; Democratic nominee for Fla. secretary of state, 1990; U.S. House of Representatives, 1993-present
Born: Sept. 5, 1936; Altamonte Springs, Fla.
Residence: Delray Beach
Religion: African Methodist Episcopal
Family: Divorced; three children
Education: Fisk U., B.A. 1958; Howard U., attended 1958-60; Florida A&M U., J.D. 1963
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1992 (12th term)
Committee Assignments: Rules

Election History
2014generalAlcee Hastings (D) 128,49881.6
Jay Bonner (R) 28,96818.4
2012generalAlcee Hastings (D) 214,72787.9
Randall Terry (NPA) 29,55312.1
Anthony Dutrow (WRI) 50.0
2010generalAlcee Hastings (D) 100,06679.1
Bernard Sansaricq (R) 26,41420.9
2008generalAlcee Hastings (D) 172,83582.2
Marion Thorpe (R) 37,43117.8
2006generalAlcee Hastings (D) 00.0
2004generalAlcee Hastings (D) 00.0
2002generalAlcee Hastings (D) 96,34777.5
Charles Laurie (R) 27,98622.5
2000generalAlcee Hastings (D) 89,17976.3
Bill Lambert (R) 27,63023.7
1998generalAlcee Hastings (D) 00.0
1996generalAlcee Hastings (D) 102,14673.5
Robert Brown (R) 36,89726.5
Edward Lievens () 210.0
1994generalAlcee Hastings (D) 00.0
1992generalAlcee Hastings (D) 84,24958.5
Ed Fielding (R) 44,80731.1
Al Woods (I) 14,87910.3
Roll Call Vitals


Florida is 2nd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@rephastingsfl)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.