Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio)

District: 10th District
Political Highlights: mayor of Dayton, 1994-2002; defeated for re-election as mayor of Dayton, 2001; U.S. House of Representatives, 2003-present
Born: Jan. 11, 1960; Dayton, Ohio
Residence: Dayton
Religion: Protestant
Family: Wife, Majida Mourad; two children
Education: Ohio Northern U., B.A. 1982; Case Western Reserve U., J.D. 1985; U. of Dayton, M.B.A. 1992
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2002 (7th term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Strategic Forces; Tactical Air & Land Forces - Chairman); Oversight & Government Reform (Transportation & Public Assets); Select Intelligence (Defense Intelligence & Overhead Architecture; Emerging Threats)

Election History
2014generalMichael Turner (R) 130,75265.2
Robert Klepinger (D) 63,24931.5
David Harlow (LIBERT) 6,6053.3
2012generalMichael Turner (R) 208,20159.5
Sharen Neuhardt (D) 131,09737.5
David Harlow (LIBERT) 10,3733.0
2010generalMichael Turner (R) 152,62968.1
Joe Roberts (D) 71,45531.9
2008generalMichael Turner (R) 200,20463.3
Jane Mitakides (D) 115,97636.7
2006generalMichael Turner (R) 127,97858.5
Richard Chema (D) 90,65041.5
2004generalMichael Turner (R) 197,29062.3
Jane Mitakides (D) 119,44837.7
2002generalMichael Turner (R) 111,63058.8
Rick Carne (D) 78,30741.2
Ronald Williamitis (I) 140.0
Roll Call Vitals


Ohio is 14th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@RepMikeTurner)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.