Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. K. Michael Conaway (R-Texas)

District: 11th District
Political Highlights: Midland school board, 1985-88; Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 1995-2002; candidate for U.S. House (special election), 2003; U.S. House of Representatives, 2005-present
Born: June 11, 1948; Borger, Texas
Residence: Midland
Religion: Baptist
Family: Wife, Suzanne Conaway; four children
Education: East Texas State U., B.B.A. 1970
Military Service: Army, 1970-72
Start of Service: Elected: 2004 (6th term)
Committee Assignments: Agriculture; Armed Services (Oversight & Investigations; Seapower & Projection Forces); Select Intelligence (CIA; NSA & Cybersecurity)

Election History
2014generalK. Conaway (R) 107,93990.3
Ryan Lange (LIBERT) 11,6359.7
2012generalK. Conaway (R) 177,74278.6
Jim Riley (D) 41,97018.6
Scott Ballard (LIBERT) 6,3112.8
2010generalK. Conaway (R) 125,58180.8
James Quillian (D) 23,98915.4
James Powell (LIBERT) 4,3212.8
Jim Howe (GREEN) 1,4490.9
2008generalK. Conaway (R) 189,62588.3
James Strohm (LIBERT) 25,05111.7
2006generalK. Conaway (R) 107,268100.0
2004generalK. Conaway (R) 177,29176.8
Wayne Raasch (D) 50,33921.8
Jeffrey Blunt (LIBERT) 3,3471.5
2003special runoffRandy Neugebauer (R) 28,54650.5
K. Conaway (R) 27,95949.5
2003specialRandy Neugebauer (R) 13,09122.4
K. Conaway (R) 12,27021.0
Carl Isett (R) 11,01518.9
David Langston (R) 8,05313.8
Roll Call Vitals


Texas is 3rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@ConawayTX11)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.