The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Evan Bayh (D-Ind.)

Political Highlights: Ind. secretary of state, 1986-89; governor, 1989-97; U.S. Senate, 1999-2011
Born: Dec. 26, 1955; Shirkieville, Ind.
Residence: Indianapolis
Religion: Episcopalian
Family: Wife, Susan Bayh; two children
Education: Indiana U., B.S. 1978; U. of Virginia, J.D. 1981
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1998 (2nd term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Airland; Emerging Threats & Capabilities; Readiness & Management Support - Chairman); Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs (Financial Institutions & Consumer Protection; National Security & International Trade and Finance - Chairman; Securities, Insurance & Investment); Energy & Natural Resources (Energy; National Parks; Water & Power); Small Business & Entrepreneurship; Select Intelligence; Special Aging

Election History
2004generalEvan Bayh (D) 1,496,97661.7
Marvin Scott (R) 903,91337.2
Albert Barger (LIBERT) 27,3441.1
1998generalEvan Bayh (D) 1,012,24463.7
Paul Helmke (R) 552,73234.8
Rebecca Sink-Burris (LIBERT) 23,6411.5
Roll Call Vitals


Indiana is 42nd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@SenDanCoats)

Evan Bayh has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) has the most appearances so far this year.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.