Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.)

(Defeated for other office)

District: At Large
Political Highlights: Mont. House, 1985-91; lieutenant governor, 1991-97; Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, 1996
Born: Oct. 5, 1955; Billings, Mont.
Residence: Billings
Religion: Episcopalian
Family: Wife, Janice Lenhardt Rehberg; three children
Education: Montana State U., attended 1973-74; Washington State U., B.A. 1977
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2000 (6th term)
End of Service: Jan. 3, 2013
Committee Assignments: Appropriations (Energy-Water; Labor-HHS-Education - Chairman; Legislative Branch)

Election History
2012generalJon Tester (D) 236,12348.6
Denny Rehberg (R) 218,05144.9
Dan Cox (LIBERT) 31,8926.6
2010generalDenny Rehberg (R) 217,69660.4
Dennis McDonald (D) 121,95433.8
Mike Fellows (LIBERT) 20,6915.7
2008generalDenny Rehberg (R) 308,47064.1
John Driscoll (D) 155,93032.4
Mike Fellows (LIBERT) 16,5003.4
2006generalDenny Rehberg (R) 239,12458.9
Monica Lindeen (D) 158,91639.1
Mike Fellows (LIBERT) 8,0852.0
2004generalDenny Rehberg (R) 286,07664.4
Tracy Velazquez (D) 145,60632.8
Mike Fellows (LIBERT) 12,5482.8
2002generalDenny Rehberg (R) 214,10064.6
Steve Kelly (D) 108,23332.7
Mike Fellows (LIBERT) 8,9882.7
2000generalDenny Rehberg (R) 211,41851.5
Nancy Keenan (D) 189,97146.3
James Tikalsky (LIBERT) 9,1322.2
1996generalMax Baucus (D) 201,93549.6
Denny Rehberg (R) 182,11144.7
Becky Shaw (REF) 19,2764.7
Stephen Heaton (NL) 4,1681.0
Roll Call Vitals


Montana is 40th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.