Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.)

District: 5th District
Political Highlights: Republican nominee for Kan. House, 1982; Colo. House, 1995-98; Colo. Senate, 1998-2007; U.S. House of Representatives, 2007-present
Born: May 24, 1954; Leavenworth, Kan.
Residence: Colorado Springs
Religion: Christian
Family: Wife, Jeanie Lamborn; five children
Education: U. of Kansas, B.S. 1978; U. of Kansas, J.D. 1985
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2006 (5th term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Emerging Threats and Capabilities; Strategic Forces); Natural Resources (Energy & Mineral Resources - Chairman; Oversight and Investigations); Veterans' Affairs (Disability Assistance & Memorial Affairs; Oversight & Investigations)

Election History
2014generalDoug Lamborn (R) 157,18259.8
Irv Halter (D) 105,67340.2
2012generalDoug Lamborn (R) 199,63965.0
Dave Anderson (NPA) 53,31817.4
Jim Pirtle (LIBERT) 22,7787.4
Misha Luzov (GREEN) 18,2846.0
Kenneth Harvell (AC) 13,2124.3
2010generalDoug Lamborn (R) 152,82965.8
Kevin Bradley (D) 68,03929.3
Brian Scott (AC) 5,8862.5
Jerell Klaver (LIBERT) 5,6802.4
2008generalDoug Lamborn (R) 183,17860.0
Hal Bidlack (D) 113,02537.0
Brian Scott (AC) 8,8942.9
2006generalDoug Lamborn (R) 123,26459.6
Jay Fawcett (D) 83,43140.3
Roll Call Vitals


Colorado is 39th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@RepDLamborn)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.