The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.)

District: 5th District
Political Highlights: candidate for Chicago City Council, 1991; Cook County Board of Commissioners, 1998-2009; U.S. House of Representatives, 2009-present
Born: Oct. 17, 1958; Indianapolis, Ind.
Residence: Chicago
Religion: Christian
Family: Wife, Barbara Quigley; two children
Education: Roosevelt U., B.A. 1981; U. of Chicago, M.P.P 1985; Loyola U. Chicago, J.D. 1989
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2009 (3rd full term)
Committee Assignments: Appropriations (Financial Services; Transportation-HUD); Select Intelligence (Emerging Threats - Ranking Member; NSA & Cybersecurity)

Election History
2014generalMike Quigley (D) 116,36463.2
Vince Kolber (R) 56,35030.6
Nancy Wade (GREEN) 11,3056.1
2012generalMike Quigley (D) 177,72965.7
Dan Schmitt (R) 77,28928.6
Nancy Wade (GREEN) 15,3595.7
2010generalMike Quigley (D) 108,36070.6
David Ratowitz (R) 38,93525.4
Matt Reichel (GREEN) 6,1404.0
2009specialMike Quigley (D) 30,56169.2
Rosanna Pulido (R) 10,66224.2
Matt Reichel (GREEN) 2,9116.6
Roll Call Vitals


on the House Seniority List

Fellow Illinois Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D) is 55th.


Illinois is 16th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@RepMikeQuigley)

Rep. Mike Quigley has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) has the most appearances so far this year.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.