Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.)

District: 5th District
Political Highlights: N.J. Assembly, 1990-2003; sought Republican nomination for U.S. House, 1998; sought Republican nomination for U.S. House, 2000; U.S. House of Representatives, 2003-present
Born: July 9, 1959; Englewood, N.J.
Residence: Wantage
Religion: Protestant
Family: Wife, Mary Ellen Garrett; two children
Education: Montclair State College, B.A. 1981; Rutgers U., J.D. 1984
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2002 (7th term)
Committee Assignments: Budget; Financial Services (Capital Markets & Government Sponsored Enterprises - Chairman; Housing and Insurance)

Election History
2014generalScott Garrett (R) 104,67855.4
Roy Cho (D) 81,80843.3
Mark Quick (FA) 2,4351.3
2012generalScott Garrett (R) 167,50155.0
Adam Gussen (D) 130,10042.7
Patricia Alessandrini (GREEN) 6,7702.2
2010generalScott Garrett (R) 124,03064.9
Tod Theise (D) 62,63432.8
Ed Fanning (GREEN) 2,3471.2
Mark Quick (FA) 1,6460.9
James Radigan (BD) 3360.2
2008generalScott Garrett (R) 172,65355.9
Dennis Shulman (D) 131,03342.4
Ed Fanning (GREEN) 5,3211.7
2006generalScott Garrett (R) 112,14254.9
Paul Aronsohn (D) 89,50343.8
R. Matthew Fretz (AIV) 2,5971.3
2004generalScott Garrett (R) 171,22057.6
Anne Wolfe (D) 122,25941.1
Victor Kaplan (LIBERT) 1,8570.6
Thomas Phelan (C) 1,5150.5
Gregory Pason (S) 5740.2
2002generalScott Garrett (R) 118,88159.5
Anne Sumers (D) 76,50438.3
Michael Cino (LTI) 4,4662.2
Roll Call Vitals


New Jersey is 8th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@repgarrett)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.