Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.)

Political Highlights: N.H. Governor's Executive Council, 1979-81; U.S. House of Representatives, 1981-89; governor, 1989-93; U.S. Senate, 1993-2011
Born: Feb. 14, 1947; Nashua, N.H.
Residence: Rye Beach
Religion: Congregationalist
Family: Wife, Kathleen MacLellan Gregg; three children
Education: Columbia U., A.B. 1969; Boston U., J.D. 1972; Boston U., LL.M. 1975
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1992 (3rd term)
Committee Assignments: Appropriations (Commerce-Justice-Science; Defense; Homeland Security; Interior-Environment; Labor-HHS-Education; State-Foreign Operations - Ranking Member); Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs (Financial Institutions & Consumer Protection; Housing, Transportation & Community Development; Securities, Insurance & Investment); Budget; Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (Children & Families; Employment & Workplace Safety; Primary Health and Retirement Security)

Election History
2004generalJudd Gregg (R) 434,84766.2
Doris Haddock (D) 221,54933.7
1998generalJudd Gregg (R) 213,47767.8
George Condodemetraky (D) 88,88328.2
Brian Christeson (LIBERT) 7,6032.4
Roy Kendel (IA) 4,7331.5
1992generalJudd Gregg (R) 249,59148.2
John Rauh (D) 234,98245.3
Katherine Alexander (LIBERT) 18,2143.5
Larry Brady (I) 9,3401.8
Ken Blevens (I) 4,7520.9
David Haight (NL) 1,2840.3
1986generalJudd Gregg (R) 85,47974.0
1984generalJudd Gregg (R) 138,97576.0
1982generalJudd Gregg (R) 92,09871.0
1980generalJudd Gregg (R) 113,30464.0
Roll Call Vitals


New Hampshire is 50th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@kellyayotte)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.