Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.)

District: 6th District
Political Highlights: sought Republican nomination for Ariz. House, 1988; Ariz. House, 1991-95; sought Republican nomination for U.S. House, 1994; Ariz. State Board of Equalization chairman, 1995-2003; Maricopa County treasurer, 2004-06; Republican nominee for U.S. House, 2008; U.S. House of Representatives, 2011-present
Born: March 3, 1962; Los Angeles, Calif.
Residence: Fountain Hills
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Wife, Joyce Schweikert; one child
Education: Scottsdale Community College, A.A. 1985; Arizona State U., M.B.A. 2005; Arizona State U., B.S. 1987
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2010 (3rd term)
Committee Assignments: Financial Services (Capital Markets & Government Sponsored Enterprises; Monetary Policy & Trade; Terrorism Financing Task Force); Joint Economic

Election History
2014generalDavid Schweikert (R) 129,57864.9
W. Williamson (D) 70,19835.1
2012generalDavid Schweikert (R) 179,70661.3
Matt Jette (D) 97,66633.3
Jack Anderson (LIBERT) 10,1673.5
Mark Salazar (GREEN) 5,6371.9
James Ketover (WRI) 10.0
2010generalDavid Schweikert (R) 110,37452.0
Harry Mitchell (D) 91,74943.2
Nick Coons (LIBERT) 10,1274.8
2008generalHarry Mitchell (D) 149,03353.2
David Schweikert (R) 122,16543.6
Warren Severin (LIBERT) 9,1583.3
Roll Call Vitals


Arizona is 33rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@repdavid)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.