Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. George Radanovich (R-Calif.)


District: 19th District
Political Highlights: Mariposa County Board of Supervisors, 1989-92; sought Republican nomination for U.S. House, 1992; U.S. House of Representatives, 1995-2011
Born: June 20, 1955; Mariposa, Calif.
Residence: Mariposa
Religion: Roman Catholic,
Family: Widowed; one child
Education: California Polytechnic State U., B.S. 1978
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1994 (8th term)
End of Service: Jan. 3, 2011
Committee Assignments: Energy & Commerce (Commerce, Manufacturing & Trade; Communications & Technology; Oversight & Investigations)

Election History
2008generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 179,24598.4
Peter Leinau (D) 2,4901.4
2006generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 110,24660.6
TJ Cox (D) 71,74839.4
2004generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 155,35466.0
James Bufford (D) 64,04727.2
Larry Mullen (GREEN) 15,8636.7
2002generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 106,20967.3
John Veen (D) 47,40330.0
Patrick McHargue (LIBERT) 4,1902.7
2000generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 144,51764.9
Daniel Rosenberg (D) 70,57831.7
Elizabeth Taylor (LIBERT) 4,2641.9
Robert Miller (NL) 1,9900.9
Edmon Kaiser (AMI) 1,2660.6
1998generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 131,10579.4
Jonathan Richter (LIBERT) 34,04420.6
1996generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 137,40266.6
Paul Barile (D) 58,45228.3
Pamela Pescosolido (LIBERT) 6,0832.9
David Adalian (NL) 4,4422.2
1994generalGeorge Radanovich (R) 104,43556.8
Richard Lehman (D) 72,91239.6
Dolores Comstock (LIBERT) 6,5793.6
Roll Call Vitals


California is 1st on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.