Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Del. Donna M.C. Christensen (D-V.I.)

District: At Large
Political Highlights: Virgin Is. Democratic Territorial Committee, 1980-97; Virgin Is. Board of Education, 1984-86; Virgin Is. acting commissioner of health, 1993-94; sought Democratic nomination for U.S. House, 1994; U.S. House of Representatives, 1997-2015
Born: Sept. 19, 1945; Teaneck, N.J.
Residence: St. Croix
Religion: Moravian
Family: Divorced; two children
Education: Saint Mary's College (Ind.), B.S. 1966; George Washington U., M.D. 1970
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1996 (9th term)
Committee Assignments: Energy & Commerce (Commerce, Manufacturing & Trade; Energy & Power; Health)

Election History
2012generalDonna Christensen (D) 13,27356.6
Warren Mosler (I) 3,96816.9
Norma Pickard-Samuel (I) 3,38614.4
Holland Redfield (R) 2,40910.3
Guillaume Mimoun (I) 3751.6
2010generalDonna Christensen (D) 19,84471.7
Jeffrey Moorhead (None) 5,06318.3
Vincent Danet (R) 2,3298.4
Guillaume Mimoun (None) 4191.5
2008generalDonna Christensen (D) 18,23799.6
2006generalDonna Christensen (D) 18,32262.9
Warren Mosler (I) 10,80037.1
2004generalDonna Christensen (D) 17,37965.8
Warren Mosler (I) 7,52228.5
Krim Ballentine (R) 1,5125.7
2002generalDonna Christensen (D) 20,41467.7
Virdin Brown (ICM) 4,45614.8
Lilliana de O'Neal (R) 4,28614.2
Garry Sprauve (I) 9963.3
2000generalDonna Christensen (D) 18,62578.4
Victor Frazer (I) 3,51614.8
Jorge Estemac (ICM) 1,6086.8
1998generalDonna Christensen (D) 23,41380.1
Victor Frazer (R) 5,83219.9
1996general runoffDonna Christensen (D) 12,45151.5
Victor Frazer (I) 11,70448.5
1996generalDonna Christensen (D) 11,29938.3
Victor Frazer (I) 10,10634.3
Kenneth Mapp (R) 8,06327.4
Roll Call Vitals

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.