Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Gary G. Miller (R-Calif.)

District: 31st District
Political Highlights: Diamond Bar Municipal Advisory Council, 1988-89; Diamond Bar City Council, 1989-90; sought Republican nomination for Calif. Senate, 1990; Diamond Bar City Council, 1991-95; sought Republican nomination for Calif. Senate (special election), 1994; Calif. Assembly, 1995-98; U.S. House of Representatives, 1999-2015
Born: Oct. 16, 1948; Huntsville, Ark.
Residence: Rancho Cucamonga
Religion: Protestant
Family: Wife, Cathy Miller; four children
Education: Mt. San Antonio Community College, attended 1968-70
Military Service: Army, 1967
Start of Service: Elected: 1998 (8th term)
Committee Assignments: Financial Services (Financial Institutions & Consumer Credit; Housing and Insurance); Transportation & Infrastructure (Highways & Transit; Railroads, Pipelines & Hazardous Materials; Water Resources & Environment)

Election History
2012generalGary Miller (R) 88,96455.2
Robert Dutton (R) 72,25544.8
2010generalGary Miller (R) 127,16162.2
Michael Williamson (D) 65,12231.9
Mark Lambert (LIBERT) 12,1155.9
2008generalGary Miller (R) 158,40460.2
Edwin Chau (D) 104,90939.8
2006generalGary Miller (R) 129,720100.0
2004generalGary Miller (R) 167,63268.1
Lewis Myers (D) 78,39331.9
2002generalGary Miller (R) 98,47667.8
Richard Waldron (D) 42,09029.0
Donald Yee (LIBERT) 4,6803.2
2000generalGary Miller (R) 104,69558.9
Rudy Favila (D) 66,36137.4
David Kramer (NL) 6,5603.7
1998generalGary Miller (R) 68,31053.2
Eileen Ansari (D) 52,26440.7
Cynthia Allaire (GREEN) 3,5972.8
Kenneth Valentine (LIBERT) 2,5292.0
David Kramer (NL) 1,7141.3
Roll Call Vitals


California is 1st on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.