Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.)

District: 2nd District
Political Highlights: Snohomish County Council, 1998-00; U.S. House of Representatives, 2001-present
Born: June 15, 1965; Arlington, Wash.
Residence: Everett
Religion: Methodist
Family: Wife, Tiia Karlen; two children
Education: Pacific Lutheran U., B.A. 1987; U. of Minnesota, M.P.A. 1990
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2000 (8th term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Seapower & Projection Forces; Strategic Forces); Transportation & Infrastructure (Aviation - Ranking Member; Railroads, Pipelines & Hazardous Materials)

Election History
2014generalRick Larsen (D) 122,17360.6
B.J. Guillot (R) 79,51839.4
2012generalRick Larsen (D) 184,82661.1
Dan Matthews (R) 117,46538.9
2010generalRick Larsen (D) 155,24151.1
John Koster (R) 148,72248.9
2008generalRick Larsen (D) 217,41662.4
Rick Bart (R) 131,05137.6
2006generalRick Larsen (D) 157,06464.2
Doug Roulstone (R) 87,73035.8
2004generalRick Larsen (D) 202,38363.9
Suzanne Sinclair (R) 106,33333.6
Bruce Guthrie (LIBERT) 7,9662.5
2002generalRick Larsen (D) 101,21950.1
Norma Smith (R) 92,52845.8
Bruce Guthrie (LIBERT) 4,3262.1
Bernard Haggerty (GREEN) 4,0772.0
2000generalRick Larsen (D) 146,61750.0
John Koster (R) 134,66045.9
Stuart Andrews (LIBERT) 7,6722.6
Glen Johnson (NL) 4,2311.4
Roll Call Vitals


Washington is 11th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.


Twitter Followers (@RepRickLarsen)

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.