Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.)

District: 8th District
Political Highlights: Mich. Senate, 1995-00; U.S. House of Representatives, 2001-15
Born: June 2, 1963; Livonia, Mich.
Residence: Howell
Religion: Methodist
Family: Wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers; two children
Education: Adrian College, B.A. 1985
Military Service: Army, 1985-88
Start of Service: Elected: 2000 (7th term)
Committee Assignments: Energy & Commerce (Communications & Technology; Health); Select Intelligence

Election History
2012generalMike Rogers (R) 202,21758.6
Lance Enderle (D) 128,65737.3
Daniel Goebel (LIBERT) 8,0832.3
Preston Brooks (NPA) 6,0971.8
2010generalMike Rogers (R) 156,93164.1
Lance Enderle (D) 84,06934.3
Bhagwan Dashairya (LIBERT) 3,8811.6
2008generalMike Rogers (R) 204,40856.5
Robert Alexander (D) 145,49140.2
Will White (LIBERT) 4,3731.2
Aaron Stuttman (GREEN) 3,8361.1
George Zimmer (USTAX) 3,4991.0
2006generalMike Rogers (R) 157,23755.3
Jim Marcinkowski (D) 122,10742.9
Dick Gach (LIBERT) 2,7651.0
Aaron Stuttman (GREEN) 2,3620.8
2004generalMike Rogers (R) 207,92561.1
Robert Alexander (D) 125,61936.9
Will White (LIBERT) 3,5911.1
John Mangopoulos (USTAX) 3,2881.0
2002generalMike Rogers (R) 156,52567.9
Frank McAlpine (D) 70,92030.8
Thomas Yeutter (LIBERT) 3,1521.4
2000generalMike Rogers (R) 145,19048.8
Dianne Byrum (D) 145,07948.8
Bonnie Bucqueroux (GREEN) 3,4671.2
James Eyster (LIBERT) 2,4670.8
Patricia Allen (NL) 7150.2
Francisco Gualdoni (USTAX) 6910.2
Roll Call Vitals


Michigan is 7th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.