Member Guide | Roll Call

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.)

District: 4th District
Political Highlights: Fla. House, 1972-78; candidate for Fla. secretary of state, 1978; sought Republican nomination for U.S. Senate, 1980; Fla. Senate, 1986-94; sought Republican nomination for governor, 1994; U.S. House of Representatives, 2001-present
Born: Sept. 1, 1944; Jacksonville, Fla.
Residence: Jacksonville
Religion: Episcopalian
Family: Wife, Kitty Crenshaw; two children
Education: U. of Georgia, A.B. 1966; U. of Florida, J.D. 1969
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2000 (8th term)
Committee Assignments: Appropriations (Defense; Financial Services - Chairman; State-Foreign Operations)

Election History
2014generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 177,88778.3
Paula Moser-Bartlett (NPA) 35,66315.7
Gary Koniz (NPA) 13,6906.0
Deborah Pueschel (WRI) 130.0
2012generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 239,98876.1
Jim Klauder (NPA) 75,23623.8
Gary Koniz (WRI) 2460.1
2010generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 178,23877.2
Troy Stanley (NPA) 52,54022.8
Deborah Pueschel (D) 400.0
Gary Koniz (WRI) 270.0
2008generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 224,11265.3
Jay McGovern (D) 119,33034.7
2006generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 141,75969.7
Robert Harms (D) 61,70430.3
2004generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 256,15799.6
2002generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 171,15299.7
Charles Knause () 5090.3
2000generalAnder Crenshaw (R) 203,09067.0
Tom Sullivan (D) 94,58731.2
Deborah Pueschel (I) 5,6091.9
Roll Call Vitals


Florida is 2nd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.